"So, when are they going to start the drawdown? And are we going to have an empty lake this fall?"
Council member Susan Tjarks was relaying what residents kept asking her, and she said it herself at a city council meeting back in the summer of 2024, more than two years ago. Back then nobody had a real answer. This September, for the first time since the city first floated that original fall 2025 start date, Mitchell finally has one, and it is not the sudden empty-bathtub scenario a lot of people pictured when they first heard the word "drawdown."
If you fish off the west launch, walk your dog on the Bill Platz Kiwanis Trail, or keep a dock in the water at Lions Point, here is what is actually about to change around the lake this fall, and why it took an extra year to get here.
The Answer, With Actual Dates on It
The city's own notice says it plainly: the drawdown is expected to go out for bid this fall, pending final permits. Public Works Director Joe Schroeder has told the Mitchell Republic he is hoping permits clear by September, which would let the city award a construction contract in October and start construction that runs October through December, including the day the crew finally cuts a 20-foot opening into the south side of the spillway.
That timeline did not exist a year ago. Here is how the promise actually moved:
| Milestone | Originally planned | What actually happened |
|---|---|---|
| Drawdown bid | Fall 2025 | Permits stalled after the state flagged new study requirements in August 2025 |
| Dam safety finding | Not anticipated | Houston Engineering found the spillway could handle only a 23% probable maximum flood against a 50% state requirement |
| Variance approval | N/A | Granted by the state Water Management Board on May 6, 2026 |
| Drawdown bid, take two | Fall 2026 | On track, permits expected to clear by September 2026 |
| Dredge start | Spring 2026 | Earliest possible start pushed to 2027, according to Mayor Jordan Hanson |
The gap between the two "fall" columns is the whole story. A single engineering finding, not city hesitation, is why residents who expected an empty lake a year ago are only now getting one.
Why an Extra Year Got Added to a Project People Already Voted For
Mitchell voters approved the lake restoration project by a margin of about thirty votes back in June 2024, financed through a $16,815,900 loan from the state's Clean Water State Revolving Fund at 3.5% interest, repaid with sales tax revenue. That should have been the hard part. Instead, the state's Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources came back in August 2025 and required a breach dam analysis and a Probable Maximum Flood study before anyone could touch the spillway.
Houston Engineering ran the numbers using updated hydraulic modeling and about fifty more square miles of watershed than the studies from the 1990s ever accounted for. The finding: Lake Mitchell's earthen dam and spillway could safely pass water from a storm event with a 23% probable maximum flood. State rule requires 50% for a reservoir this size, since Lake Mitchell is classified as a high hazard dam, meaning a failure carries potential for loss of life downstream.
The city requested a variance rather than rebuild the dam to a higher standard, arguing that upgrading it wouldn't meaningfully reduce the already-low risk. The state's Water Management Board agreed and approved the variance unanimously on May 6, 2026, with conditions attached: the city has to update its emergency plans annually and keep an eye on any future changes to flood risk in the watershed.
One casualty of that year-long pause was smaller but noticeable if you fish: back in 2024, Mayor Hanson had floated asking the state for liberalized fishing, meaning no catch limits, ahead of the original drawdown so anglers could clean out the lake before a fish kill. That window came and went along with the delayed timeline. Whether liberalized fishing gets revisited ahead of this fall's drawdown has not been announced.
What the Water Actually Does Once It Starts Moving
Once permits clear and a contractor is under contract, the drop itself is engineered to be slow, not dramatic. Schroeder has described a controlled lowering using siphons and pumps starting in October, with the lake dropping no more than a foot per day and a maximum discharge of 200 cubic feet per second, which he equated to roughly three to four inches of water passing over the spillway at a time. The full drawdown is expected to take a month and a half to three months.
That pace matters for anyone downstream. Paul Muth, a landowner along the James River below the Firesteel Creek outlet, has pushed back hard on the plan, arguing that phosphorus and nitrogen-laden sediment draining off the lake bottom will land on his property whether the city means it to or not. The James River Water Development District sent a formal letter asking the city to consider a gated pipe or valve system instead of a spillway breach, arguing it would allow for gradual release and an emergency shutoff during storms. Schroeder has told the paper the city intends to stick with its original plan and does not expect the letter to change the permitting timeline.
What Changes for the Rest of Us This Fall
The lake is not closing. Parks and Recreation Director Kevin Nelson has said the city owns roughly 70% of the land around the shoreline and intends to keep it open and functioning through construction, down to considering whether mosquito spraying will be needed further out onto what used to be lake bottom.
Here is what that looks like in practice:
- Trails stay open. The roughly 13 miles of hiking and biking trails around the lake, including West Launch Trail and the Bill Platz Kiwanis Trail, are expected to remain accessible, though the shoreline views along them will change shape as water recedes.
- Docks and lifts need to come out on your own schedule, not the calendar's. A local dock and lift contractor told the city council he was already fielding daily calls from lake residents last fall asking when to pull their equipment, well before an official date existed. With construction now expected to run October through December, anyone with gear in the water should plan to have it out before the spillway cut begins.
- Fishing takes a hit, then a reset. Engineers have confirmed the drawdown and dredge will cause a significant fish kill. The state's Game, Fish and Parks department has agreed to restock the lake afterward.
- Irrigation gets complicated for city facilities. Lakeview Golf Course alone pulls an average of 400,000 gallons a night from the lake, close to 15% of the city's total daily allowed water usage through B-Y Water. Cadwell Sports Complex and the Pepsi-Cola Soccer Complex draw similar volumes for their fields. City staff have said they are still working out how those facilities keep watering greens and fields once the lake level drops.
- Firesteel Park becomes the dumping ground, temporarily. Dredged sediment will be piled inside a 20-foot berm at the park. What happens to that site afterward, whether it becomes a sledding hill or gets planted with trees, is undecided and up to the city council and park board down the road.
Who's Actually Paying for the Rest of It
The $25 million project breaks down as $3.5 million for the drawdown structure, $16.5 million for the dredge itself, $1 million in construction phase services, and a $3.2 million contingency fund on top of the state loan. Friends of Firesteel, a local volunteer group whose board includes Mitchell resident Joe Kippes, has been raising private money to help close funding gaps, with $1.7 million already pledged from foundations and private donors as of last fall. The group has said the delays have made fundraising harder, since donors keep asking the same question Tjarks was fielding at council meetings: when does this actually start.
As of September 1, 2026, the city's own site lists no water quality advisories for Lake Mitchell, so for now the lake looks and behaves the way it always has. That changes once the bid is awarded and the spillway cut begins. If you use the lake regularly, this is the fall to watch the city's updates rather than assume the old rumors still apply.
If you're weighing what a lakeside property near Mitchell is worth to you while all of this plays out, or you just want a neighbor's read on how the neighborhood is shifting, I'm happy to talk it through. Chris Foster has been asked most of these same questions by clients living near the water, and would rather give you a straight answer than a guess. Let's Connect.